Archive for February, 2013

Free Speech or Censorship at Hilo H.S.?

Sunday, February 17th, 2013

Check out the blogs.  The controversy at Hilo HS is spreading

http://www.ilind.net/2013/02/17/controversy-brewing-over-academic-freedom-at-hilo-high-school/#comments

http://kauaieclectic.blogspot.com/2013/02/musings-sighs.html


In an email to me, Kauai journalist, Joan Conrow, wrote: "Maybe the librarian should take a couple of vacation days if she's 
so offended.  Can she really control who comes to speak in the library, or set guidelines for what they say? 
Since when does being a school librarian make her an arbiter of free speech or what can and can't be presented 
to students?  And is she, someone who is obviously pro-military, actually able to determine what is truly 
a "negative viewpoint" or "objective?""

Is Peace a “Negative Viewpoint?”

Saturday, February 16th, 2013

Guest speaker invitation at Hilo High School sparks controversy!

Aloha Joey and all,Mahalo for sharing information on the controversy your invitation for me to speak at Hilo H.S on March 6th and 8th has sparked.  Frankly, I’m a bit offended at Ms Okuyama’s comments where she appears to want to act as the Library gatekeeper and censor of what I can and cannot say in my presentations on militarism at home and abroad.  My presentations will be critical of the military presence in Hawaii and U.S. wars abroad and I hope to instill critical thinking and questioning in students as well, even of my own presentation.  Does speaking out for peace and being critical of government policies constitute “negative viewpoints?”  To me, respectful dialogue is an important part of participation in a democracy.  I hope I can encourage and motivate students to become responsible, politically engaged citizens, and speak out for justice, peace, and the future of their world.  I would suggest that if this is not acceptable in the Hilo H.S. library, we switch the site of my presentations.  I wonder if military recruiters and ROTC instructors have similar difficulties making presentations.

Jim

Jim Albertini Malu ‘Aina Center For Non-violent Education & Action P.O. Box AB Ola’a (Kurtistown) Hawai’i 96760 Phone 808-966-7622 Email ja@malu-aina.org Visit us on the web at www.malu-aina.org

On 2/15/2013 3:24 PM, Joseph_Watts/HILOH/HIDOE@notes.k12.hi.us wrote:

Aloha!

Well, I guess I needed to discuss this with you further earlier, Amy. I thought that I had told you that the guest speaker would be Jim Albertini. Sorry about that. The lesson outlined in the request for scheduling the library that I emailed you is exactly as it is on the letter just emailed. I’ll discuss this with Jim and Aaron and Todd and if necessary we can switch the site to their classrooms instead of the library if there’s room. I understand where you’re coming from and we will work this out. If after Jim reads this and he agrees to abide by your guidelines then maybe we can stick with the program as is. Otherwise we can figure something else out.

Mahalo,
JW
Inactive hide details for Amy Okuyama/HILOH/HIDOEAmy Okuyama/HILOH/HIDOE

Amy Okuyama/HILOH/HIDOE02/15/2013 02:29 PM

To

Joseph Watts/HILOH/HIDOE@HIDOE

cc

Aaron Kubo/HAWAIIDO/HIDOE@HIDOE, ja@malu-aina.org., Robert Dircks/HILOH/HIDOE@HIDOE, Todd Sato/HILOH/HIDOE@HIDOE

Subject

Re: guest speakerJoseph Watts

Thank you for this outline of your speaker’s topic and your class objectives. I welcome any speaker in the library for educational purposes. But in this case, the speaker is a “well known activist”, and (I now find out that) the topic is the military. As a ‘military mom”, I request that the speaker stick to the topic as described here, and not deviate to personal negative opinions/attacks on the military, its actions, or its presence anywhere, with instructions on how students can or should protest the military, etc. in any manner. I can’t opt out of my library and be forced out of my own work site and I won’t be subjected to anti-military speeches as had once occurred w/another speaker in here. My son was deployed at the time and it was extremely upsetting to me; Mr. Dircks said he wouldn’t permit it to happen that way again. I respect Mr. Albertini and the freedom of speech, but within the library, I want assurance that he will be objective and factual. I’m concerned that this will not be the case for the simple fact that Mr. Albertini not known for his objectivity and is very out-spoken about his views. Had an objective, factual presentation been sought, the speaker would have been one who is more “academic” such as a college lecturer or other expert. I’m skeptical of how/what this activist will say to a group of impressionable youngsters – if the speaker were not so controversial, why the “opt out” offer?
If the presentation will be strictly informational with zero negative slants, I will be fine with having the speaker. However, if it turns into a forum of Mr. Albertini’s personal negative views/examples to our students, I will be against library use for the subsequent presentations. Like Mr. Albertini, I have my own very strong views on the military. Again, I welcome him, providing he remains objective and dispassionate, just present the facts of the “history of military presence in HI. etc….” without diversion into any negative viewpoints.
Can I be assurred of this? It isn’t a personal attack on Mr. Albertini, who I respect for who he is – he has his rights, but I have my rights too, and our students are to be considered as well. Please let me know.
Thank you,
Amy
Inactive hide details for Joseph Watts/HILOH/HIDOEJoseph Watts/HILOH/HIDOE

Joseph Watts/HILOH/HIDOE02/15/2013 12:15 PM

To

Aaron Kubo/HAWAIIDO/HIDOE@HIDOE, Todd Sato/HILOH/HIDOE@HIDOE

cc

ja@malu-aina.org, Amy Okuyama/HILOH/HIDOE@HIDOE, Robert Dircks/HILOH/HIDOE@HIDOE

Subject

guest speaker

Aloha!

Ok, so we got the ok from the principal, the speaker, and the librarian. It’s a go for our presentation, on March 6th (2nd and 4th periods), and March 8th (3rd and 5th periods). Attached are the letter home that I will be using (Mr. Dircks confirmed that we do need to give students an opt out option), and also the presentation assignment that my students will need to complete there in the library. It’s up to you if you want to use them or change them or make your own.

I have Todd Sato down for his PID classes joining us during 2nd, 3rd, and 4th periods, and Aaron Kubo down for his PID class joining us for 5th period. So the total count for each presentation will be around 30-40 students, and participation in democracy will be the main focus of the presentations (beside the others mentioned on the letter home). Since Mr. Albertini is an expert in participating in democracy as an activist, we should learn a lot from this. I am looking forward to his insights again and hope that our students get a lot out of it.

If any of you have any questions, please let us know. Mr. Albertini’s email address is cc’d here to keep him in the loop, and you are welcome to email him with any questions.

Mahalo,
JW

(See attached file: Letter home for presentation on 3-6 & 3-8.docx)(See attached file: Presentation Assignment.docx)

Blasphemy!

Wednesday, February 13th, 2013
The U.S. National Religion & Its False god
flag

“The national religion of the United States of America is nationalism.  Its god is the flag.  Its prayer is the pledge of allegiance.  The flag’s powers include those of life and death…  Its myths are built around the sacrifice of lives to protect against the evils outside the nation.  Its heroes are soldiers who make such sacrifices based on unquestioning faith…  Its high priest is the Commander in Chief…

“What happens to myths like these when we discover that flying killer robots make better soldiers than soldiers do?  Or when we learn that the president is using those flying robots to kill U.S. citizens?
A majority (in the U.S.) supports the power of the president to kill non-U.S.ians with drones, while a significantly smaller percentage supports the president’s power to kill U.S. citizens with drones
abroad.  That is to say, if the high priest declares someone an enemy of god, many people believe he should have the power to kill that enemy . . .

“Some top U.S. military officials have said the drones are creating more new enemies than they kill…  The president has declared that any unidentified dead male of fighting age was, by definition, a militant.  After all, he was killed.  Yet, this we know for certain:  He was someone’s child. He was someone’s loved one.  He was someone’s friend.

“We have a responsibility right now to grow up very, very quickly.  Our government is breaking down the rule of law and stripping away our rights in the name of protecting us from an enemy it generates through the same process.  Drones are not inevitable. Drones are not in charge of us…  There is no excuse for supporting the murder of foreigners in cases in which we would not support the murder of U.S. citizens.  There is no excuse for supporting a policy of murdering anyone at all…”

See the full article Drones and Our National Religion By David Swanson

http://warisacrime.org/content/drones-and-our-national-religion
Do Not Worship False Gods!
1. Mourn all victims of violence. 2. Reject war as a solution. 3. Defend civil liberties. 4. Oppose all discrimination, anti-Islamic, anti-Semitic, anti-Hawaiian, etc.  5. Seek peace through justice in Hawai`i and around the world.
Malu `Aina Center for Non-violent Education & Action P.O. Box AB Kurtistown, Hawai`i 96760.
Phone (808) 966-7622 Emai ja@malu-aina.orghttp://www.malu-aina.org
Hilo Peace Vigil leaflet (Feb. 15, 2013– 595th week) – Friday 3:30-5PM downtown Post Office

The Case for Repeal of PLDC

Tuesday, February 12th, 2013

Repeal the Public Land Development Corporation (PLDC)

http://honoluluweekly.com/feature/2012/10/take-back-the-act/

Mauna Kea Sacred Mt. –Not a Commodity!

Monday, February 11th, 2013
12:05 am – February 11, 2013 — Updated: 12:05 am – February 11, 2013

TMT hearing set for Tuesday

By COLIN M. STEWART
Tribune-Herald staff writer
The state Board of Land and Natural Resources will hear testimony Tuesday at 11 a.m. concerning the long-debated, $1.3 billion Thirty Meter Telescope project planned for the summit of Mauna Kea.
Both opponents and proponents of the project will gather outside the Hawaii County Building in Hilo before the hearing, which will feature final oral arguments from the parties on the TMT construction permit.
Petitioners include Deborah Ward, KAHEA, Paul Neves, Clarence Kukauakahi Ching, Mauna Kea Anaina House and the family of E. Kalani Flores and B. Pua Case.
The hearing comes after a contested case hearing over a conservation district use permit. Hearing officer Paul Aoki concluded the case hearing more than a year ago. He then released his 126-page decision in November, recommending approval for what is planned to be one of the world’s most powerful optical/infrared telescopes following a decade-long construction project.
Tuesday is an opportunity for supporters and opponents from various vantage points in the debate to have the land board hear their oral arguments in response to Aoki’s report, albeit for no more than 30 minutes per side, according to an order filed by the board. The general public will not have a chance to testify.
Last week, the Hawaii Island Chamber of Commerce, which has long stood in support of the TMT plans, sent out an email to its members, requesting that they attend Tuesday’s meeting.
“This is a really important milestone for TMT,” reads the email from chamber spokesman Miles Yoshioka. “HICC members have been supportive of TMT at every step and we need everyone’s kokua to take TMT over the finish line. Please help us get the word out to come and support the last TMT public meeting. This community has been instrumental in getting this project to where it is today.”
Chamber President Vaughn Cook said Friday that the chamber’s support for TMT is about much more than business interests that will benefit from the economic impact of the project.
“Sure, it’s a benefit to the community from a business point of view, but we also support a vision of this benefiting not only us but the rest of the world,” he said. “The people in the scientific community agree that Mauna Kea is really the best place in the world for astronomy. … We’re excited about the contributions that can be made to our community, to education, and to mankind’s understanding of the universe.”
Such advances will come at too high a cost, however, according to many of those who oppose the project. Conservationists, Hawaiian cultural practitioners and others say that the impacts of such a massive undertaking will do irreparable harm to one of the most unique and cherished landscapes on Earth.
“Please support us as we seek to protect Mauna Kea from further industrialization,” reads a blog posting by Lauren Muneoka of the KAHEA Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance.
“Mauna Kea is overbuilt. The TMT Environmental Impact Statement says that industrial telescope structures on Mauna Kea have had a ‘signficant, substantial, and adverse impact’ on the natural and cultural resources of this conservation district. With a construction footprint of 8 acres and building height of 18 stories, the TMT would contribute to the over-industrialization of the fragile conservation area of this sacred mountain.”
Opponents of the project intend to gather at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday outside the Hilo County Building before the 11 a.m. hearing, which will take place in room 1401. Supporters are also planning to gather for a sign waving along Aupuni Street before the meeting at 9 a.m.
Email Colin M. Stewart at cstewart@hawaiitribune-herald.com.